Right to resell: in the event of a sale, the seller cannot resell the goods even if the goods are in their possession. If he does, he is guilty of an offence and the buyer can claim damages from the seller. In the event of a sale agreement, the seller remains the owner. If he resells the goods, he is guilty of an offence and the original buyer can only claim damages. As noted above, the sale is immediate, while a sale agreement will be reached in the future based on certain conditions. Thus, at the time of the sale, there is an effective transfer, whereas at the time of the agreement to sell future transfers, there is. Risks are transferred immediately into the sale, while in the sales contract, risks are attached to the seller until the goods are transferred in the future. The sale is an executed contract, while the sales agreement is a contract of execution. Agreement between the people who form a partnership is necessary for the creation of a partnership. On a sale agreement is in the future a promise that the property will be transferred to the rightful owner, while the sale deposit is the actual transfer of the property to the buyer. However, if the goods are sold and the property is transferred to the buyer, the seller is not paid.

Then the seller can go to court and file a lawsuit against the buyer for the damage and price. On the other hand, if the goods are not delivered to the buyer, they can also sue the seller for damages. However, ownership of the goods, i.e. ownership of the goods, is transferred immediately from the seller to the sales contract or must not lead to an actual sale of the property in question. Some stamp tax laws, such as the Maharashtra Stamp Act, consider that an agreement to sell a property on the same basis as a proper transport record, as well as a proper transport record, are subject to the same stamp duty as the one in force for the proper sale of a property. Under these provisions, which require the payment of stamp duty on a sales contract, a sale agreement is wrongly considered a good act of sale. However, section 8 of the aforementioned law deals with the goods that flow before the sale, but under the sale agreement, so that this section again highlights the goods that, through no fault of the seller or buyer, are damaged or corrupted. It is therefore also a sale agreement. In the case of Cehave N.V.

v Bremer Handelsgesellschaft mbH; Hansa North (1976) Q.B.44, the facts indicated that a written contract for the sale of fruit pellets contained the express provision to “ship in good condition. In fact, some of the pellets were not in good condition during shipping. However, upon arrival, they were still fit for the appropriate purpose and, although they were of less value than they should have been, they could have been resold at a reduced cost. Then there are the notable distinguishing points between the partnership company and the Hindu Joint Family Firm if the merchandise is to be transferred to the buyer in the future or known as the sales agreement under certain conditions. On 31 October 2020, a 40-year-old man was arrested by Noida police for deceiving a bank of 2 Crores by forging debt and using loans. On the same day, the judge of the main meetings of Madurai, G Ilangovan, granted two sub-registries arrested by the Sanddigul Criminal Police Office, an early bail, on charges of recording documents without prior verification.