5) In case of semi-auxiliary obstructiation, there is no correspondence with the direct object, because the object always belongs to the infinitive, not to the semi-auxiliary. Many people want to reject the direct object agreement – what do you think? Read the article and discuss on Facebook: But the verbs of Have need consistency in a specific construction: the past participation must correspond to the direct object if it precedes the verb. “The pancakes I ate”: a new deal for the past….
Agreement With Object
Comments are closed.